Categories
How to Cite
Copyright notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Gunalan Palari Arumugam, Alishya Gunalan, Aishwarya Gunalan
Keywords
Abstract
Medicolegal issues have a significant impact on the practice of anaesthesiologists worldwide. Current trends indicates that although anaesthesiologists are less likely to be sued compared to other specialities, the payouts by anaesthesiologists are huge due to the high cost associated with the long-term management of patients with cerebral palsy and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. The impact on anaesthesiologists is acknowledged, with many societies worldwide taking various steps to address them, such as the Second Victim Programme by the Malaysian Society of Anaesthesiologists. This aims to address some of the potential mental health issues affecting anaesthesiologists facing the aftermath of a poor clinical outcome and subsequently having to deal with the process of litigation. Various solutions have been addressed to acknowledge medicolegal issues in Malaysia, such as mediation as a way forward for dispute resolution. However, solutions such as this will take time for widespread adoption, and as such, the impact will not be immediately felt. It is far better for anaesthesiologists to be proactive in having increased awareness of the challenges associated with litigation via comprehensive medicolegal education.
References
Lee YK. The first anaesthetic in the Straits settlements (Singapore, Penang and Malacca) --1847. Br J Anaesth. 1972;44(4):408–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/44.4.408
Hambali SN, Khodapanahandeh S. A review of medical malpractice issues in Malaysia under tort litigation system. Glob J Health Sci. 2014;6(4):76–83. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p76
Krishna SR. Medico-legal aspects of anaesthesia practice. Medical Journal of Malaysia. 1991:46(4):320–328.
Oglesby FC, Ray AG, Shurlock T, Mitra T, Cook T. Litigation related to anaesthesia: Analysis of claims against the NHS in England 2008–2018 and comparison against previous claim patterns. Anaesthesia. 2022;77(5):527–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15685
Cass NM. Medicolegal claims against anaesthetists: A 20-year study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004;32(1):47–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X0403200108
Crosby ET, Duggan LV, Finestone PJ, et al. Anesthesiology airway-related medicolegal cases from the Canadian Medical Protection Association. Can J Anesth. 2021;68: 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01846-7
Ministry of Health Malaysia. (2019). CML Bulletin 2019. (Accessed April 1, 2025). Available from: https://hq.moh.gov.my/medicalprac/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/e-bulletin-CML-2019.pdf
Ministry of Health Malaysia. (2025). Annual Report 2023. (Accessed April 1, 2025). Available from: https://www.moh.gov.my/moh/resources/Penerbitan/Penerbitan%20Utama/MOH_Annual_Report_2023_updt_2Jan2025.pdf
Thaqif Asyraf bin Khairol Nizam (suing through his mother and litigation representative, Syazwani binti Drani) v Government of Malaysia & Ors, [2023] 1 LNS 2261.
Nur Adeena bt Mohd Syahmir v Kerajaan Malaysia & Ors, [2023] 10 MLJ 580.
Siow Ching Yee (Suing Through His Wife and Litigation Representative, Chau Wai Kin) v Columbia Asia Sdn Bhd, [2024] 3 MLJ 66.
Datin Nor Rizam bt Abdul Wahab (menyaman sebagai pentadbir estet Dato’ Ir Zainudin bin A Kadir) v Pusat Pakar Tawakal Sdn Bhd & Ors, [2024] MLJU 1292.
Dr Esa Kamaruzaman v Dr Neville anak Michael Gomis (mendakwa dengan sendirinya dan sebagai pentadbir estet Maisarah binti Repin, simati) & 2 Ors, [2025] 1 AMR 925 (CA).
Malaysian Medical Council. (n.d.). Medical Amendment Act 2012. (Accessed March 24, 2025). Available from: https://mmc.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/MEDICAL-AMENDMENT-ACT-2012.pdf
Malaysian Medical Council. (n.d.). Laws and regulations. (Accessed March 24, 2025). Available from: https://mmc.gov.my/laws-regulations/
Samanta A, Samanta J, Gunn M. Legal considerations of clinical guidelines: Will NICE make a difference? J R Soc Med. 2003;96(3):133–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768030960031 0
Malaysia Civil Law Act 1956. Section 3.
Puteri Nemie, S. J. (n.d.). Medical negligence in Malaysia. (Accessed April 12, 2025). Available from: https://mdm.org.my/downloads/dr_puteri_nemie.pdf
Wu AW. Medical error: The second victim: The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):726–727.
Malaysian Society of Anaesthesiologists. (n.d.). A-SHIELD Peer Support After Adverse Events SVP Booklet. (Accessed April 11, 2025). Available from: https://www.msa.net.my/PDFdl/A-SHIELD%20Peer%20Support%20After%20Adverse%20Events%20SVP%20Booklet.pdf
Seys D, Wu AW, Van Gerven E, et al. Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: A systematic review. Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(2):135–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278712458918
Arbel E, Reese A, Oh K, Mishra A. Medical law and medical school curricula: A systematic review. Cureus. 2024;16(2), e54377. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54377
Puteri Nemie JK, Ariff Osman HO, Ramizah WM. Educating future medical professionals with the fundamentals of law and ethics. IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia. 2017;16(2). https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v16i2.334
Bernama. (2025, April 12). News report. (Accessed April 12, 2025). Available from: https://www. bernama.com/en/news.php?id=2389879
Dimitrov K, Miteva-Katrandzhieva T. Mediation in healthcare: Enhancing conflict resolution between patients and physicians beyond the courtroom. Cureus. 2024;16(12):e75487. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75487